Here's your guide to beating the skeptics into the ground with style and efficient use of language.
-jacob
You may have been wondering just how Al Gore’s been filling his time since decorating his mantle with a much-deserved Oscar for An Inconvenient Truth. Or maybe you’ve already caught wind of the epic day of live day of concerts he’s been planning. It’s called Live Earth, and on this coming Saturday (7/7/07), star-studded lineups will be belting out a global S.O.S.—in this case to “Save Our Selves.”
In the last couple of weeks, much ado has been made of Al Gore’s “inconvenient” utility bills. Dug up by a local free-market group, the bills reveal that Gore’s Nashville home uses about 20 times more juice than the national average. “Hypocrite!,” the neo-cons decried. They say that the global warming crusader isn’t, “living the lifestyle that he advocates.”
Such criticisms are the oldest smear tactic in the book. Can’t argue your opponent’s position – undermine his credibility.
While researching the “greening” of this year’s Academy Awards, I came across a lot of bloggers from within the environmental community itself bemoaning the ceremony. A number of hardcore greenies were claiming that the Awards greening effort hadn’t gone far enough. The cars might have been electric, but why didn’t they run on vegetable oil? Materials had been printed on 30 percent post-consumer recycled paper, but why not 50 percent? The Oscars had been made partially from recycled material, but why weren’t previously-awarded statuettes reclaimed, refurbished, and re-awarded?